Wednesday, December 31, 2014

2014 Year End Entertainment Extravaganza

Movies

I'm certain you've read my annual Top 10 list on Downright Creepy; however, I find that I must ssupplement it with additional information not allowed within that format.  Mainly, I feel the need to explain why a list of ten movies on a horror website has only two horror movies on it.  It's quite simple really.  2014 was a terrible year for horror!

If you look at the major studio releases for the year, not that I'm recommending you do, you'll find justification for my declaration.  Paranormal Activity: The Marked Ones, The Quiet Ones, Oculus, Annabelle and Dracula Untold all failed to thrill me.  I was surprised that I enjoyed Paranormal Activity: The Marked Ones and Dracula Untold as much as I did, but that's hardly strong enough criteria for a Top 10 movie.  The only studio movie I enjoyed enough to include was Godzilla and, to be honest, I may still have been on a high from meeting the cast and director at Comic-Con last year.

Yep, The Babadook is scary!

Independent horror fared better and was the source for my favorite horror movie of the year, The Babadook.  I watched more movies at home this year than in theaters.  However, none of them, including Odd Thomas, Patrick: Evil Awakens, The Sacrament, The Guest, Tusk, Horns, Mercy, VHS: Viral and Late Phases are Top 10 material.  (About The Babadook, though…  fantastic!  Horror rises from a very real, very personal family situation, which made the scares very real and very personal, as well.  Terrific performances contribute to another favorite movie from Australia, following The Loved Ones, from 2009.)

I should also note that while they were on my list to watch, I never got around to seeing The Town That Dreaded Sundown, [REC] Apocalypse, Cabin Fever: Patient Zero, Stage Fright, Only Lovers Left Alive, Devil's Due, As Above So Below, Deliver Us from Evil, Starry Eyes, Dead Snow: Red vs. Dead, Exists, Willow Creek and A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night.  It's conceivable that one or two of those could have made the Top 10, and I'll certainly alert you if they do.

This is how you'll feel if you don't watch The Signal.
If good horror was not a trend in 2014, good science fiction certainly was.  In fact, my favorite movie of the year (of any genre) was the mind blowing sci-fi thriller, The Signal.  More than half the movies on my Downright Creepy top ten list were science fiction.  (70% of them are sci-fi if you count Godzilla.)  I enjoyed immensely Guardians of the Galaxy, X-Men: Days of Future Past, Interstellar, Edge of Tomorrow and Dawn of the Planet of the Apes.  The biggest surprise among these was Edge of Tomorrow.  It's a crime that movie didn't get a bigger audience. Forget Tom Cruise, it's Emily Blunt's movie and it's an incredible amount of fun.

That leaves only one Oscar-bait movie on the list, Birdman at number ten.  It doesn't really fit into the horror-thriller-science fiction genres; however, it counts because the character Michael Keaton plays was made famous by portraying a Batman-like superhero character in a series of blockbuster movies.  Also, Birdman contains one scene of sci-fi brilliance as the character that haunts him comes to life in an epic battle on the streets of New York.  Since the movie is largely about what happen inside Keaton's head and his fantasies merging with reality, I'll maintain the argument that it belongs on the list.

If I didn't get to see as many genre movies as I wanted to this year, I barely scratched the surface of seeing any "regular" movies.  The one drama that made my list (because it's also a thriller) was Nightcrawler.  Nothing else I saw would replace any of the genre movies on my list.  But neither have I been particularly motivated to see many of the non-genre movies that were released in 2014.  The only one that's even on my radar as a must-see before the end of the year is Boyhood.  It may be safe to say that 2014 was not only terrible for horror, but also for movies in general, at least in terms of what I wanted to see.

Tilda Swinton in Snowpiercer.
Let's talk a moment about my favorite performances this year.  These will undoubtedly be different from any Oscar nominees since my favorite performances don't usually equate with the "best" performances.  The one that stands out was from a movie not on my Top 10 list, but one that would make a Top 20 list, if there were one.  That is Tilda Swinton's in Snowpiercer.  In a way, her character of Mason is similar to that of Effie (Elizabeth Banks) in The Hunger Games movies; however, the difference in acting is like that between night and day, between scary and cartoonish. Swinton is amazing, once again completely committing herself to her craft.

Jake Gyllenhaal in Nightcrawler.
Jake Gyllenhaal also commits to his craft in Nightcrawler, losing weight for his role as Louis Bloom.  Gyllenhaal is probably my favorite actor these days, but I don't know that his performance stands out any better than Michael Keaton's in Birdman.  Likewise, Ben Affleck is very good in Gone Girl, but I go back and forth wondering if his character of Nick Dunne was really as ambiguous as he appeared, or if that was just Affleck's acting style (which is to say, he doesn't have much of one).  So, none of the male performances really equal the one female performance of Tilda Swinton.

As far as directing, the technical talent demonstrated by making an entire movie seem as though it was filmed in one shot makes me respect and admire the work Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu did for Birdman.  However, the pure energy and enthusiasm James Gunn infused into Guardians of the Galaxy make his resulting movie a more entertaining success.  When I first heard about the production of Guardians of the Galaxy, I was skeptical.  But it must have been Gunn's vision that turned an unknown comic from the dark corners of the Marvel universe into the year's most rollicking adventure.  It's what movie making at its best can be all about.

My new year's resolution for 2015 is to be more positive.  I don't want to focus on the bad side of everything; plenty of other people do that.  As part of this initiative, I want to be more conscientious about recognizing the best parts of the entertainment I experience.  There's something good about everyone and everything.  Pointing out the bad is easy.  It's lazy.  Finding the good is more challenging.  Sometimes, it's more creative.  As a transition to this new me, I'm going to present, not the "worst" movies of the year, but the ones "I enjoyed the least."  This implies I enjoyed, at least a little, every movie I saw.  That isn't necessarily true, but it's… nicer.

Really, there were only two movies "I enjoyed the least."  The first was Transcendence.  You can read all my negative thoughts about this one on Downright Creepy; however, the positive thing I will say is… nothing.  Because, if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all.  The best thing I can say about Tammy is that it had a great trailer.  Not since Norbit (2007) has the trailer for a movie been so funny that I wanted to see the full-length movie.  Then very early in its running time, I realized I had been duped, not in an innocent "oh, well, you win some, you lose some" way, but in an angry "I've been effin' cheated" way.

Television

If the horror genre is struggling on the big screen, it's thriving on the small screen.  I could almost make a Top 10 list of only the horror-fantasy-science fiction shows I regularly watch.  At the top is American Horror Story.  Admittedly, it's flawed; however, it never fails to entertain and I never know what to expect when I watch it.  Hannibal is probably a better show, but I forgot to put it on my list, probably because it's not currently airing; out of sight, out of mind.  I ranked Bates Motel second, but that's not because it's a great show.  It's just that I enjoy watching it and writing about it.  It's the knowledge of what I think is to come that drives my interest.

Twisty the Clown from American Horror Story: Freak Show.
There are at least 20 horror-fantasy-science fiction shows I regularly watch.  To be honest, I stick with some of them just so I feel like I'm not missing anything, but there is only a handful I'd consider "must see TV."  Of the comic book shows, Gotham is my favorite, although I watch Arrow, The Flash, Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. and Constantine.  Of the mystery shows, The Leftovers is my favorite, although I watch(ed) Gracepoint, The Intruders and The Missing.  Of the young adult shows, I can't claim a favorite, but I equally enjoy Supernatural, Teen Wolf and The Vampire Diaries.

What, no Walking Dead?!?  I watch it, I like it.  However, more times than not, it infuriates me.  I'm thrilled that it's finding such success, but in my humble opinion, it's vastly overrated.  There, I said it.  Similarly, I find the continuing success of Under the Dome a complete puzzler.  It has become one of the most ridiculous shows of any genre on TV.  The only thing I can imagine is that the person in charge of summer programming at CBS isn't in the most stable mental state.  How else can you explain the news that there will be a second season of Extant, the Halle Berry miniseries that blasted off to nowhere… fast.

I liked The Strain… at first.  But as the season wore on, it became too similar to The Walking Dead.  Really, why does the way you kill the vampires have to be the exact same way you kill the zombies?  The most promising limited run show was Penny Dreadful on Showtime.  When it was good, it was sublime.  However, it was way too unsteady on its feet.  I love the concept of mixing horrific literary characters into an ongoing continuity, but the focus shifted wildly among episodes.  I'd have been happy with a series revolving entirely around Dorian Gray (the stunningly beautiful Reeve Carney).

Reeve Carney in Penny Dreadful.

If none of these "enjoyable" shows are the "best", then what is?  Rarely has the answer to a question been so simple: The Good Wife.  The normal trajectory of a show is for it to start waning in the fifth and sixth seasons, but this one bucks the trend and has never been better.  Nearly the same thing can be said for Web Therapy, currently running on Showtime.  It's in its fourth season and has never been funnier.  In fact, this is a fantastic time to be a Lisa Kudrow fan.  After almost ten years, The Comeback returned for a second season.  I don't remember much about the first season, but this one is at least as good, if not better.

With the exception of The Good Wife, it's pay cable that continues to offer the highest quality programming.  Homeland reinvented itself, to a certain extent, and had an outstanding season.  The Newsroom ended its run with six terrific episodes, although for some reason I can't understand, seemed to be loathed by most critics.  The Affair, Ray Donovan and Masters of Sex all started out strong, but I began to lose interest as their seasons advanced.  In particular, The Affair was infuriating to me.  During its last couple of episodes, I came just short of shouting at my TV screen.

Jonny Lee Miller in Elementary.
Basic cable offered two promising shows.  On F/X, it was Tyrant, which began as a compelling surprise, but got a little silly.  On WGN America, it was Manhattan, which I never really loved, but felt drawn to watch.  I think I have several episodes sitting on my DVR.  For reliable entertainment, I can always rely on a show in its third season on a traditional network channel, CBS: Elementary.  It took a while to warm up to the dynamic of Sherlock's (Jonny Lee Miller) new protégé in relationship to Watson (Lucy Liu), but I never watch an episode that I don't enjoy.

Comics, Magazines & Books

In 2014, I continued to decrease purchasing print comics in favor of their digital versions.  This sometimes means waiting a month or two for their price to come down, but it has made a significant impact on my budget (not to mention the cost of supplies for bagging and boarding).  Further, I limited the number of digital comics I bought.  I lost interest in most of DC Comics' New 52 superheroes and regularly read only Batman, Earth 2, Flash, Justice League and Superman, and I read those mostly because of their authors.  I'll read almost anything Scott Snyder (Batman) and Geoff Johns (Justice League, Superman) write.

Where I got burned was starting out with a couple of weekly series.  I should have known this from the past, but it's hard to sustain a single story every week for an entire year.  The quality is inconsistent and the purpose becomes cloudy.  Halfway through its run, Futures End is boring and confusing to me.  Batman Eternal has been a little more solid, but even with it, I can't remember what the overarching plot is.  A glutton for punishment, I've read the first two issues of Earth 2: World's End.  My problem is that once I start reading one of these weekly series, it's hard for me to stop, even if I'm not entirely enjoying them.

Outcast is like "What ever happened to The Exorcist?!?"
Some of my favorite digital comics right now are creator-owned titles from Image.  I've been reading Clone for a couple years, but started Nailbiter, Outcast and Wytches in 2014.  Morning Glories is compelling, like a Lost for comics, but I keep feeling like one day I'm going to have to start all over and read through them at once to get everything I can from it.  Saga has continued to be entertaining and surprising.  But like the TV show, I'm growing a little weary of The Walking Dead comic.  It's definitely past its prime; it's been a while since I couldn't wait to read the next issue.

I added quite a few back issues to my monster magazine collection this year, although higher-priced issues of Famous Monsters of Filmland continue to elude me.  On a regular basis, the only magazine I'll buy no matter what is Horror Hound.  If a magazine can represent a person's interests and taste perfectly, Horror Hound is the one that does it for me.  I still subscribe to Entertainment Weekly, but rarely flip through the physical issue that arrives torn and tattered in the mailbox.  I keep it handy only until I read the digital version on my iPad that comes free with the subscription.

I saw Stephen King and got an autographed copy of Revival!

I'm embarrassed to say I read only a couple of books this year, and most of them were written by Stephen King.  I read Mr. Mercedes in one day on a train trip to Chicago.  It's definitely Stephen King-lite, but it was a page turner.  I just finished Revival last week.  It started out slowly, but about halfway through, I couldn't put it down.  Overall, I think his writing has become more succinct.  His books are certainly shorter than they used to be.  I enjoy reading, but time is always an issue.  I think in 2015 I need to make time for reading.  I'd likely be better off doing it at the expense of some of the television I force myself to watch.

Music

I'm so out of touch with music these days, I couldn't tell you who's who or what's what.  But I started something new this year, listening to music as I fall asleep at night.  There are three soundtracks that are perfect for it:  The Tree of Life and Hannibal, volumes one and two.  I've recently begun listening to the soundtracks from Bates Motel and Stonehearst Asylum, as well.  Michael says they are too "scary," but I'm usually sawing logs a few minutes into them.

Perfect bedtime music.

This month I've been working on my holiday music collection in iTunes… listening to compilations to rate the songs, creating sub-genres to better group them, etc.  I made two additions:  Idina Menzel and Pentatonix.  I was disappointed in Idina Menzel.  My favorite song is technically not even a Christmas song, "When You Wish Upon a Star."  And I don't know what marketing scheme I blindly followed, but I didn't like Pentatonix at all.

Well, that's my year in entertainment.  It wasn't the best… it wasn't the worst.  Any year can be better than the last, but for some reason, perhaps my pop culture instinct finely tuned in my 51st year, I think it's going to be easier than usual for 2015.

Friday, October 31, 2014

Wrapping Up My Favorite 70s Horror Movies

When you notify the organizers of Countdown to Halloween that you’re going to participate, they tell you it’s not necessary to contribute every day of the month.  They don’t want it to be stressful; they want it to be fun.  For me, though, I couldn’t do it unless I posted every day.  That’s the fun part for me: planning 31 days of posts, watching all those movies, and then tying it all together at the end.  There has to be a payoff for me; what did I learn about myself during the month?

As you know by now, my theme for the month was the horror movies of the 1970s.  This was the era in which I grew up and in which I developed my lifelong interests:  comic books, Batman, Dark Shadows, Planet of the Apes, Universal Monsters, Hammer Films, Vincent Price and, of course, horror movies in general.  Individually, each movie I’ve discussed this month carries a meaningful memory for me.  But collectively, what do they say about the horror genre?  What do they say about me?

My Parents

First of all, as if I didn’t already know it, I have the greatest parents in the world!  I would never admit that I was spoiled, but how grateful am I that Gene and/or Karine would take me to see all these movies?  Most of them were rated G, GP or PG (more below), so it wasn’t a matter of them having to sit with me through all of them.  It was a matter of getting me to the theater or drive-in.  However, the point is that they did sit with me through a great many of them.


When the movie was controversial (The Exorcist) or rated R (The Reincarnation of Peter Proud), they didn’t tell me “no”; they escorted me and then afterwards offered to talk about them.  Why would they do this?  Was it to shut me up; did I just hound them until they could no longer stand it?  Or did they somehow see how much joy these movies gave me?  I know my mother enjoyed the thrillers; I’m sure I got that from her.  But my dad?  I can’t believe he endured all these movies for me.

Film Ratings

The modern voluntary movie rating system was born in 1968 with the ratings of G, M, R and X.  (M later became GP, which later became PG.)  Of the 32 movies I watched this month, 21 of them were the equivalent of today’s PG, which means “some material may not be suitable for children.”  I would say that 30 of the 32 movies I watched have some content that wouldn’t be suitable for children.  (Escape from the Planet of the Apes was rated G and Godzilla vs. Megalon was not rated.)

However, I would also say that of the 21 rated the equivalent of PG, several of them would be rated R if they were made today.  I realize that society changes over time, but the subject matter acceptable without parental restriction in the 1970s continues to amaze me.  (I wrote more about this in my post for The Reincarnation of Peter Proud.)  What I’m wondering now, looking at the general trend, is if horror movies were being made for kids instead of for adults.


This was during the final years of the “Monster Kid Era”.  An entire generation had discovered the classic monster movies on TV and were devouring information about them in Famous Monsters of Filmland magazine.  Rather than actually making horror movies for kids in the 70s, I wonder if they were simply rating them as acceptable for kids because they were the appropriate audience.  Rating The Abominable Dr. Phibes R would likely have killed any success for it at the box office.

1970s Horror Trends


I love to categorize and make lists, so I explored various elements of the 32 movies I watched to see if there were any trends.  To learn if those trends carry any historical significance, we have to assume those 32 movies are “my favorite” movies from the 70s.  I compared them to 32 of “my favorite” horror movies I’ve watched and rated in the last ten years.  Below are the results:

Ratings

1969-1978
2005-2014
G
1
0
M-GP-PG
21
0
PG13
N/A
3
R
7
28
UR
3
1

The results above are obvious.  There has been a dramatic increae in the number of R-rated horror movies between the 1970s and the last ten years.  But, I’m not so sure the reasons are obvious.  It could be that the movies contain content that is more adult in nature.  However, could it also be that we have actually become stricter in the United States about content that we think is more adult in nature?

Horror Sub-Genres

1969-1978
2005-2014
# “Creature”
6
1
# “Mad Scientist”
5
0
# “Devil/Demons”
4
1
# “Vampire”
3
3
# “Nature Gone Bad”
3
0
# “Hagspoitation”
2
0
# “Gory Thriller”
2
8
# “Haunted House/Ghosts”
2
6
# “Sci-Fi”
2
2
# “Portmanteau”
1
2
# “Giant Monster”
1
0
# “Reincarnation”
1
0
# “Foreign Horror”
0
2
# “Slasher”
0
5
# “Zombies”
0
2

I was interested in the sub-genres that were popular with me during the two eras.  The majority of my favorite horror movies in the 70s dealt with creatures, mad scientists, the devil or demons, and vampires.  The majority of my favorite horror movies in the last ten years are gory thrillers, haunted house or ghost movies, and slasher films.

Companies Producing Horror Films

1969-1978
2005-2014
American International
6
0
20th Century Fox
3
2
Hammer Films
3
1
Bing Crosby Prod.
2
0
MGM
2
0
Warner Bros./Subsidiaries
2
8
Amicus
1
0
Toho
1
0
Columbia/Sony
0
2
Lionsgate
0
1
Paramount/Subsidiaries
0
2
Universal
0
1
Other/Independent
10
15

What companies were a horror fan’s friends in the 70s, producing the most of my favorite films in the genre?  Without a doubt, American International Pictures (AIP) takes the crown.  Hammer Films is second at half the number of movies; however, they were winding down production in the mid-70s.  Still, the majority of horror movies in the 70s were produced by independent filmmakers.

Warner Brothers and its various subsidiaries (Dark Castle, New Line, etc.) own the crown currently, with no other major studio really making horror movies that have been favorites.  It’s interesting that the majority of horror movies are still being produced by independent filmmakers, perhaps proving that the genre is best-suited for the creativity and flexibility that exist only outside the traditional studio system.

Studios Releasing Horror Films

1969-1978
2005-2014
American International
8
0
Warner Bros./Subsidiaries
6
5
20th Century Fox/Subsidiaries
5
2
MGM
2
2
Columbia/Subsidiaries
1
2
United Artists
1
0
Lionsgate
0
2
Paramount
0
1
Universal
0
1
Television Movie
2
0
Straight to Home Video
0
2
Independent
7
14

American International again led the way for horror by releasing more of my favorite genre movies in the 70s than any other studio.  Warner Brothers and 20th Century Fox were not far behind, though.  It looks like in the 70s, the traditional studio system took the responsibility for releasing most of my favorite horror films.


But in recent years, the studios have gotten away from releasing my favorite horror movies.  Nearly 50% of them are released independently.  Nevertheless, Warner Brothers and its subsidiaries are still a horror fan’s friend.  Actually, I don’t know that they’re particularly friendly to horror of if they just release the most movies in general.

Miscellaneous

1969-1978
2005-2014
# of sequels
7
2
# based on a book (or graphic novel)
6
3
# that were/will be remade
11
7
Average IMDb User Rating
6.1
6.3
Average IMDb My Rating
7.0
7.8
Average Rotten Tomatoes Critics Rating
57.2%
57.7%
Average Rotten Tomatoes Audience Rating
57.0%
55.2%

As sequel crazy as we are these days, more of my favorite horror sequels were from the 70s, as were horror movies based on previously published books.

Eleven of my favorite horror movies of the 70s have been remade at least once since then, compared to seven of my favorite horror movies from the last ten years that are remakes.  Interestingly, none of the current favorites are remakes of my favorite 70s horror movies; however, two of them are remakes of 70s horror movies that are not my favorites.

Public opinion regarding my favorite horror movies of the 70s has not changed much with my favorite horror films of the last ten years, if you look at the average IMDb User Ratings, Rotten Tomatoes Critics Ratings and Rotten Tomatoes Audience Ratings.  This could mean that, regardless of era, the general public thinks an average horror movie would be rated about a 6 (IMDb) or around 57% (Rotten Tomatoes).

It’s interesting to me that there isn’t more of a shift one way or the other.  This might indicate that horror films have always been somewhat popular.  The only significant difference I see from this table is I’ve tended to rate my favorite horror movies from the last ten years almost a point higher on average than my favorite horror movies from the 70s.  This surprises me since I tend to complain that “they don’t make ‘em like they used to.”

Awards

There are names that appear frequently in the credits of my favorite horror movies from the 70s and I want to recognize them here as perhaps the most influential people in the genre.

Producer.  First of all is Dan Curtis, who is responsible for writing, directing and/or producing four of my favorites.  He is also responsible for 14 more genre productions that were not my favorites.

Director.  Although several directors made more than one of my favorites, there isn’t one who is a clear favorite.  Instead, I want to recognize two “up and coming” directors who got their start with my favorites:  Richard Donner and Brian DePalma.

Makeup/Special Effects.  This one is a no-brainer.  Although involved with only 3 of my favorites, this was the beginning of Rick Baker’s career.  I was a fan of his from the 1976 remake of King Kong.  In fact, when my family went to Houston on vacation, I met him at a convention.  He signed a lobby card picturing Kong’s giant palm holding Jessica Lange (who was struggling to keep her top on) with an arrow and the statement, “That’s my hand.”


Actor.  I’m surprised that more of my favorite actors don’t appear in my favorite horror movies of the 70s.  Vincent Price is in only two of them, Christopher Lee is in only one, and Peter Cushing is in only three of them.  Of course, they were all in many more horror movies during the decade.  So I’m going to judge this one based on my favorite performance, and I’d say it’s Oliver Reed from Burnt Offerings, simply because watching it recently, I hadn’t remembered how good he was in it.


Actress.  I’m going to use the same criteria to say that my favorite performance by an actress in one of my favorite 70s horror movies is Ellen Burstyn from The Exorcist.  You can refresh yourself by reading the post in which I rave about her.


Writer.  The name that appeared most frequently on my screen as I re-watched my favorite 70s horror films was Richard Matheson.  Here is a writer who I acknowledge on any given day as a favorite, yet I did not realize was so prolific in the 1970s.  The interesting thing about him is that he was prolific in the decades on either side of the 1970s as well.

Composer.  This one is a tie between two people who both composed music for many of my favorites:  Bernard Hermann and Jerry Goldsmith.  Hermann was, of course famous for his work with Alfred Hitchcock, but also scored some great music in the 70s.  Goldsmith’s most active decade was the 70s.  I never liked his music as much as I did that of John Williams; nevertheless, her scored more of my favorite 70s horror films than anyone else.

Best Movie.  Well, if you go by my ratings, my favorite movie of my favorites would be The Stepford Wives, my only perfect ten.

Worst Movie.  Similarly, my least favorite of my favorites would be Dracula vs. Frankenstein.  (You know, I shouldn’t imply that it’s a favorite by any criteria!)

Biggest Surprises.  There are a few movies that surprised me based on my memories of them.  Godzilla vs. Megalon was not as awful as I remembered.  (I didn’t say it wasn’t awful, though.)  On the other hand, The Exorcist was much better than I remembered.  Several were not as good as I remembered:  The Legend of Hell House, Asylum, Westworld and The Omen.  And several were just as great as I’ve always believed:  Escape from the Planet of the Apes, House of Dark Shadows, Sisters and Magic.

Conclusion

I think it’s obvious that I’ve liked horror films from a very young age.   Some of my favorites from the 1970s don’t hold up very well four decades later; however, I enjoy watching them over and over again… well, most of them.  Considering them collectively, I’m going to say I developed my fondness for the genre due to the way these movies stimulated my imagination.  These were not graphic movies.  Time and time again, specific scenes that I remember being terrifying are tame, perhaps laughable by today’s standards.

These movies somehow engaged me at an impressionable age.  I don’t know had I been the same age in the 80s if I would have taken as easily to the gore of slasher movies.  Conversely, I wonder if I had been the same age in the 60s if I would have become more of a strictly sci-fi fan.  Horror, fantasy, sci-fi, and thrillers share some of the same themes.  I enjoy them all, periodically favoring one or the other.  But it always comes back to horror, my first love.  I don’t know that the 70s gave us the best horror movies, but the decade sure gave us some of my favorites.

Happy Halloween!