Showing posts with label Invisible Man. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Invisible Man. Show all posts

Monday, October 12, 2015

The Invisible Woman (1940)

For this year's Countdown to Halloween, it's all-Universal Monsters, all-the-time, from Dracula (1931) to The Creature Walks Among Us (1956).  Join me daily for a fresh perspective on movies you may not have watched in a long time, if ever.  Today, a non-sequel that's more fun that it first seems... The Invisible Woman!

With the exception of the “Abbott & Costello Meet…” movies, I never really expected other comedies to be part of a Universal Classic Monsters DVD box set.  I was quite surprised when I popped The Invisible Woman (1940) into the DVD player and quickly learned it was a romantic screwball comedy.

This angered me at first and I almost stopped watching, not wanting to include it in my Countdown.  Then something odd happened.  When I put my pen down and stopped taking notes, then just sat back and watched, I ended up enjoying the movie, even though I still debate whether or not Kitty Carroll (Virginia Bruce) should be considered one of the Universal Monsters.



The Invisible Woman has absolutely nothing to do with either of the previous two Universal “invisible” movies, The Invisible Man or The Invisible Man Returns.  In fact, it’s not just a potion that turns Carroll invisible.  There’s also a machine that Professor Gibbs (John Barrymore) invented working in conjunction with the formula.

Neither device slowly drives its victim insane.  There’s no race against time to return Carroll to visibility.  Perhaps the point that finally lowered my defenses is that when she gets drunk, it alters her physiology and makes the results unpredictable.  More importantly, this is the first invisible person who knows how to have fun with her affliction.



The first thing she does is to visit her boss and literally give him a swift kick in the rear.  This may be a comedy, but THAT is realistic.  She also has great fun with teasing her unlikely playboy suitor, Richard Russell (John Howard) about what she really looks like.  Proving to him that she’s not fat, she slowly puts on her hose to give form to her lovely legs.


It’s all very light and entertaining, if not extremely old-fashioned.  A subplot about a Mexican mob’s plan to steal the invention is less so.  I’m not much for slapstick, so when the butler tumbles down the stairs and the maid gets locked in the closet, I cringe.  I have a feeling there are better movies similar to The Invisible Woman, so while I enjoyed it, it still made me want to watch something else.

Monday, October 5, 2015

The Invisible Man (1933)

For this year's Countdown to Halloween, it's all-Universal Monsters, all-the-time, from Dracula (1931) to The Creature Walks Among Us (1956).  Join me daily for a fresh perspective on movies you may not have watched in a long time, if ever.  Today, a character with whom I sometimes relate... The Invisible Man!



Although I often feel like other people don’t see me, particularly when I’m driving, I wonder what it would feel like to be truly invisible.  I’d use the power mostly to infiltrate conversations so that I could witness what someone really talks about when I’m not present.  While I would probably play a few harmless pranks, I don’t think I’d do anything malicious.



When he literally becomes transparent in the 1933 Universal classic, The Invisible Man, Jack Griffin (Claude Rains) sets his sights on something more grand: ruling the world.  The problem is, the formula he invented is also driving him crazy, so he mostly succeeds only at wreaking havoc in the village where he’s hiding and has set up an impromptu laboratory.

Griffin is a different kind of “mad scientist” than Henry Frankenstein.  They both suffer variations of a God Complex, but while Frankenstein wants to create life, Griffin remains grounded in the here and now.  Plus, Frankenstein lives to regret his actions; Griffin does not.  He has literally been driven mad and there is no hope for him, certainly not with the additional pressure of being the victim of a manhunt.

Nearly an hour into the movie, Griffin finally does some real damage, derailing a train and robbing a bank, but, hey, he gives the money away on the street outside.  With constant maniacal laughter, I never felt Griffin was a terribly dangerous guy in The Invisible Man.  I was more scared of him in the quiet moments, such as when he exacts is revenge on the colleague who betrayed him.



That would be Dr. Arthur Kemp (William Harrigan), whom Griffin blackmails to assist him and soon becomes nearly as unhinged as Griffin.  He tells Kemp that it was just a scientific experiment at first, to do something no one ever had, but  “Suddenly I realized the power I held.”  Then, “I must have a partner, Kemp, a visible partner to help me with the little things.”

“We’ll begin with a reign of terror, a few murders here and there.”  This is why I have trouble with taking Griffin seriously: his “reign of terror” consists mostly of running through the village stealing hats.  And his malice becomes petty; he becomes more enraged when he learns that the constable thinks he’s a hoax.  Rather than simply enacting a plan, he’s reacting to demonstrate how dangerous he is.

Rains is very good in the role of Jack Griffin, especially considering his face is either wrapped in bandages or invisible until the very end of the movie.  He compensates with gestures and movements that perfectly convey the stature of a madman.  I just think he goes a little far with the laughter.  Perhaps it’s exaggerated during the scenes where we can’t see him, just so we can track where he is.



The Invisible Man shares another theme with Frankenstein, although more overt.  There’s a love triangle among Griffin, Kemp and Flora Cranley (Gloria Stuart).  Kemp is more outspoken about his desire for Cranley to be with him than Victor Moritz was with Elizabeth; however, the women always seem to like the bad boys better.  She sticks up for Griffin to his very end, naively thinking he can be redeemed.




The special effects remain amazing considering this is a 1933 production.  They’re at their best when Griffin is unwrapping his bandages to reveal nothing is there (“he’s all eaten away”), but suffer a little from some unfortunate “outlining” when clothing is moving around the room.  Objects move a little too steadily, also, but when you let your imagination take it from there, the power of The Invisible Man is limitless.

Tomorrow: The Bride of Frankenstein!