Being a fan of a Ryan Murphy-created TV show is frustrating. I'm not aware of any other series that has see-sawed week to week from brilliant to awful, as much as a Ryan Murphy show. Nip/Tuck, as a whole, was an extremely entertaining show, but it was never consistent. Glee shares the same problems: characters come and go from episode to episode, complete storylines disappear and truly touching moments are negated by truly stupid ones.
Murphy may have created a workaround with American Horror Story by having each season be a self-contained story. The inconsistencies are not be as noticable in one 12-episode arc as they are in a continuing series. Don't get me wrong, they're still there; you just don't have as long to stew about them. It also doesn't hurt that the subject matter is a haunted house or asylum instead of "real life" plastic surgery or high school.
I loved the first season of American Horror Story and could hardly wait for each new epsisode. (It's one of the few shows I'd watch "live" instead of days later on my DVR.) It was just so... out there. Even though it was on basic cable, I often wondered how they got away with some of the things they showed. Truly compelling mysteries unfolded. While answers to some questions it raised came at unexpected times, it masterfully created even more.
Another huge benefit of self-contained seasons is that you can do anything you want with the characters. There are real consequences for each one because anyone could die (or worse). Nothing limits the creative possibilities. For the second season, American Horror Story: Asylum, the actors who had the most interesting roles are returning. But they'll be different characters. And I have to say, it would be a game-changer for me if the amazing Jessica Lange was not coming back.
Dylan McDermott and Connie Britton, as good of actors as they may be, will not be missed in season two. I want to see if Lange, as well as Evan Peters (Tate Langdon in season one), Lily Rabe (Nora Montgomery), Sarah Paulsen (medium Billie Dean Howeard) and Zachary Quinto (Chad Warwick) can create new characters as compelling as those from last season. Plus, I want to see the new characters that actors James Cromwell, Joseph Fiennes, Adam Levine, Chloe Sevigny and Clea Duvall bring to life.
I think I'm more excited about the return of American Horror Story than I was on Sunday about The Walking Dead. But I remain cautiously optimistic. Although season one was incredible, I have to remember that it is a Ryan Murphy show. Season two could be another story entirely... in more ways than one.
Showing posts with label The Walking Dead. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Walking Dead. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Sunday, October 14, 2012
The Reading Dead
As we welcome back The Walking Dead to TV tonight for its third season, I wanna show a little love for the comic book on which it is based. Now, I didn't read the comic before its live action version hit the screen on Halloween, 2010, which means I missed 75 or so issues since it began publication in 2003. At that point, I didn't want to backtrack and try to catch up. The task seemed too daunting.
But I'll be darned if I didn't like the TV series so much that my OCD kicked in and I simply had to start reading from the beginning. I started out in tiny parts, with the trade paperbacks each collecting six issues. I'd buy one at a time, probably once a month. At the same time, I started buying new single issues as they came out. Of course, I culdn't start reading those until I caught up with the earlier storylines.
After buying and reading the first six trade paperbacks, Comixology, a website that sells digital comics, had a big sale on The Walking Dead back issues, each one for 99 cents. I took that opportunity to fill in all issues between #37 and the point I started buying new issues. (At the same time, I stopped buying new issues at the comic shop and started buying them on Comixology.)
The point is, I have now read every comic book issue of The Walking Dead. I would love to compare the two versions, but, honestly, that would be too big a chore for me right now. It would involve a lot of re-reading and re-watching. Besides, I'm sure there are plenty of other blow-by-blow thoughts about it on the internet (as you can see from the pictures I've borrowed for this post).
At Comic-Con this year, I attended the The Walking Dead comic book panel where I heard creator Robert Kirkman repeat the company line about how each version stands on its own. I agree completely and I wish to make a plea here that everyone read the actual comic book series. Further, I'd recommend you stockpile bunches at a time to read. That is because the series is so compelling, you're not going to want to put it down.
As long as I've been reading comic books, there have been only a handful of times when I've been emotionally affected by what I'm reading. Two of those times have been during the last year when I've been catching up on The Walking Dead. It seems silly, but I have literally cried out in shock at events in this comic book. I don't know if that would have happened had I read one issue at a time. By reading several at a time, you settle into its rhythm and details remain fresh.
I am not going to reveal the moments that moved me; that's a pleasure I wish for all of you. But I will conclude by saying that I'm looking forward to an enhanced appreciation of the TV series now that I'm familiar with the source material. I'm going into it recognizing people (Michonne, The Governor) and places (the prison) from the comic book. While this builds anticipation for me, I'm catutious about it building unrealistic expectations. I must remember the company line: the TV show stands alone from the comic book. I don't have to love one as much as I do the other.
Friday, October 12, 2012
The Current State of Horror: The 2010s
"We have a lot of reason to be fearful in the world," Frank Farley, Temple University
One of the common theories used to explain the horror paradox is that people watch horror movies as a way of coping with actual fears or violence. Since one source of our fears in undoubtedly the world in which we live, I thought it would be interesting to look at the popular horror movies of different decades to see how they reflect the general fears and uncertainties of the times.
The 2010s
Before we predict horror trends for the rest of the decade, let's look at what we have so far. The first three years of the 2010s have given us... more of the same. We've already seen 17 sequels, 11 remakes, 9 torture porn/over-the-top blood and gore movies and 5 found footage movies. But which of these have been successful? That is likely the determining factor for whether these trends will continue rising or will being tapering off.
Sequels are never going to go away; they've been with us since the 1930s, the decade with which I started this series of posts. Just as one franchise dies down (Saw 3D, Hostel: Part III), another gears up (The Human Centipede 2, Paranormal Activity 4), an old one is revived (Scream 4, Prometheus) or a standard keeps plugging along (Underworld: Awakening, Resident Evil: Afterlife). I expect the life cycle of sequels to continue in perpetuity.
Remakes will probably always be with us, as well; however, I expect the number to decrease. The 2000s brought remakes of most of the big horror franchises of previous decades, so what we've gotten in the 2010s are remakes of lesser-classics (Don't Be Afraid of the Dark, Piranha 3D, I Spit on Your Grave, Fright Night and The Crazies) and remakes of foreign movies (Let Me In and Silent House). As if they were at the bottom of the remake popularity list, the remakes of remaining big-name classics (A Nightmare on Elm Street, The Wolfman, The Thing and Dark Shadows) have fizzled at the box office.
Torture porn seems to be going the route of the over-the-top blood and gore movies of the 80s. The late-2000s and early-2010s saw a couple of serious attempts (Bereavement and The Woman), but then became more outrageous (Saw 3D, Hostel: Part III and The Human Centipede). What was touted as realism a decade ago is once again turning into humorous gross-out. I expect (hope) that the subgenre will completely disappear by the end of the decade.
Just as audiences seem to be tiring of found footage movies, another one appears. The thing is, although some of the concepts are repeated, every once in a while there is still one that seems fresh. (The phenomenon has also spread to other genres, such as the Oscar-buzz-worthy End of Watch.) In my opinion, the tired ideas came from movies like Paranormal Activity 4, but found interesting approaches in The Chernobyl Diaries, Apollo 18 and V/H/S. One was even interesting (The Last Exorcism) then turned tired a few months later (The Devil Inside). This subgenre will likely fade by the middle of the decade, but pop up again every couple of years.
What are the monsters of the 2010s likely to be? Right now, they are ghosts and zombies. And they're not only going strong in movies (Ghosts: Paranormal Activity, The Innkeepers and The Woman in Black; Zombies: The Crazies, Resident Evil and REC), but now also on TV (Ghosts: American Horror Story; Zombies: The Walking Dead). Vampires seem to be waning in movies (Let Me In and Fright Night) and on TV as two popular series are getting a little (pun intended) long in the tooth (The Vampire Diaries and True Blood).
There will always be representation of the other monsters, but I think two new types will emerge in the 2010s. The first is the "ethnic monster". In The Possession, Jeffrey Dean Morgan and Kyra Sedgwick battled a spirit from Jewish mysticism. To my knowledge, this was the first specifically Jewish monster since The Golem, many decades ago. The second is even more obscure and I don't know what to name it yet. Both Insidious and Sinister dealt with very obscure horror legends, as well as offered one word adjectives as their titles. I expect other corners of the horror universe to be explored in coming years as one of the only sources of original ideas in horror.
How about monsters behind the scenes, the horror creators? Who are going to be the John Carpenters, Stephen Kings, Ridley Scotts and Wes Cravens of the 2010s? I don't believe they will be John Carpenter (The Ward), Stephen King (Bag of Bones), Ridley Scott (Prometheus) or Wes Craven (My Soul to Take). It's time to tout some new candidates, perhaps Adam Green (Frozen and Hatchet), Paco Plaza (REC) or Ti West (The Innkeepers, V/H/S). More mainstream, it may also be someone from the JJ Abrams graduating class, Drew Goddard (The Cabin in the Woods) or Matt Reeves (Let Me In). Regardless of who steps up, I expect a name to watch will be Gareth Edwards who gave us 2010s Monsters and is helming the next big-screen reboot of Godzilla.
There are two final trends I've failed to mention in any of my Countdown to Halloween posts. I wish I didn't have to, but there's no doubt that both teen fiction and 3D have influenced horror in the last several years. Love it or hate it, the Twilight saga was a phenomenon. While it's thankfully concluding this year, there is already talk of a reboot (may I suggest using actors this time around?) and I have no doubt studios are frantically searching for a new franchise for the demographic.
And, love it or hate it, 3D seems here to stay. I personally believe it's a largely unnecessary means for Hollywood to raise prices and enjoy higher profits. 3D rarely adds anything special to a movie unless it's used to make things jump off the screen at you. Yet so many are converted to 3D that don't even take advantage of the effect. I've said before, my favorite 3D movie of the modern generation was one of the first: 2009's My Bloody Valentine. 3D was used just the way it should be, as scary, silly fun.
What have we learned in our two-week study of the horror films of individual decades? Patterns emerged, cycles repeated, yet the genre evolved. But as much as things change, they really stay the same. Does it paint a bigger picture when you look at nine decades at the same time? That's one last angle left to explore...
What we're afraid of (so far) in the 2010s:
Global financial crisis
Arab spring
Unemployment
Constitutionality of same-sex marriage
Health care reform
Presidential election
Milestones of the 2010s (so far):
2010. BP's Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling rig exploded off the coast of Louisiana.
2011. U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords shot at a supermarket near Tuscon.
2011. Osama bin Laden located and killed.
2011. Hundreds of protestors occupied Wall Street.
One of the common theories used to explain the horror paradox is that people watch horror movies as a way of coping with actual fears or violence. Since one source of our fears in undoubtedly the world in which we live, I thought it would be interesting to look at the popular horror movies of different decades to see how they reflect the general fears and uncertainties of the times.
The 2010s
Before we predict horror trends for the rest of the decade, let's look at what we have so far. The first three years of the 2010s have given us... more of the same. We've already seen 17 sequels, 11 remakes, 9 torture porn/over-the-top blood and gore movies and 5 found footage movies. But which of these have been successful? That is likely the determining factor for whether these trends will continue rising or will being tapering off.
Sequels are never going to go away; they've been with us since the 1930s, the decade with which I started this series of posts. Just as one franchise dies down (Saw 3D, Hostel: Part III), another gears up (The Human Centipede 2, Paranormal Activity 4), an old one is revived (Scream 4, Prometheus) or a standard keeps plugging along (Underworld: Awakening, Resident Evil: Afterlife). I expect the life cycle of sequels to continue in perpetuity.
You can't keep a mediocre franchise down: Underworld: Awakening, Resident Evil: Afterlife, Paranormal Activity 4.
Remakes will probably always be with us, as well; however, I expect the number to decrease. The 2000s brought remakes of most of the big horror franchises of previous decades, so what we've gotten in the 2010s are remakes of lesser-classics (Don't Be Afraid of the Dark, Piranha 3D, I Spit on Your Grave, Fright Night and The Crazies) and remakes of foreign movies (Let Me In and Silent House). As if they were at the bottom of the remake popularity list, the remakes of remaining big-name classics (A Nightmare on Elm Street, The Wolfman, The Thing and Dark Shadows) have fizzled at the box office.
Torture porn seems to be going the route of the over-the-top blood and gore movies of the 80s. The late-2000s and early-2010s saw a couple of serious attempts (Bereavement and The Woman), but then became more outrageous (Saw 3D, Hostel: Part III and The Human Centipede). What was touted as realism a decade ago is once again turning into humorous gross-out. I expect (hope) that the subgenre will completely disappear by the end of the decade.
The end of torture porn? Saw 3D, Hostel Part III and The Human Centipede 2.
What are the monsters of the 2010s likely to be? Right now, they are ghosts and zombies. And they're not only going strong in movies (Ghosts: Paranormal Activity, The Innkeepers and The Woman in Black; Zombies: The Crazies, Resident Evil and REC), but now also on TV (Ghosts: American Horror Story; Zombies: The Walking Dead). Vampires seem to be waning in movies (Let Me In and Fright Night) and on TV as two popular series are getting a little (pun intended) long in the tooth (The Vampire Diaries and True Blood).
Horror on the small screen: American Horror Story, The Walking Dead and True Blood.
How about monsters behind the scenes, the horror creators? Who are going to be the John Carpenters, Stephen Kings, Ridley Scotts and Wes Cravens of the 2010s? I don't believe they will be John Carpenter (The Ward), Stephen King (Bag of Bones), Ridley Scott (Prometheus) or Wes Craven (My Soul to Take). It's time to tout some new candidates, perhaps Adam Green (Frozen and Hatchet), Paco Plaza (REC) or Ti West (The Innkeepers, V/H/S). More mainstream, it may also be someone from the JJ Abrams graduating class, Drew Goddard (The Cabin in the Woods) or Matt Reeves (Let Me In). Regardless of who steps up, I expect a name to watch will be Gareth Edwards who gave us 2010s Monsters and is helming the next big-screen reboot of Godzilla.
The future of horror? Ti West's The Innkeepers and Gareth Edwards's Monsters and Godzilla.
There are two final trends I've failed to mention in any of my Countdown to Halloween posts. I wish I didn't have to, but there's no doubt that both teen fiction and 3D have influenced horror in the last several years. Love it or hate it, the Twilight saga was a phenomenon. While it's thankfully concluding this year, there is already talk of a reboot (may I suggest using actors this time around?) and I have no doubt studios are frantically searching for a new franchise for the demographic.
And, love it or hate it, 3D seems here to stay. I personally believe it's a largely unnecessary means for Hollywood to raise prices and enjoy higher profits. 3D rarely adds anything special to a movie unless it's used to make things jump off the screen at you. Yet so many are converted to 3D that don't even take advantage of the effect. I've said before, my favorite 3D movie of the modern generation was one of the first: 2009's My Bloody Valentine. 3D was used just the way it should be, as scary, silly fun.
What have we learned in our two-week study of the horror films of individual decades? Patterns emerged, cycles repeated, yet the genre evolved. But as much as things change, they really stay the same. Does it paint a bigger picture when you look at nine decades at the same time? That's one last angle left to explore...
What we're afraid of (so far) in the 2010s:
Global financial crisis
Arab spring
Unemployment
Constitutionality of same-sex marriage
Health care reform
Presidential election
Milestones of the 2010s (so far):
2010. BP's Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling rig exploded off the coast of Louisiana.
2011. U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords shot at a supermarket near Tuscon.
2011. Osama bin Laden located and killed.
2011. Hundreds of protestors occupied Wall Street.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




















