Thursday, October 25, 2012

Explaining the Horror Paradox: Theory #5

I began my Countdown to Halloween pondering the question of why we love horror movies. I wrote about the "horror paradox", a phenomenon where, although we find the horrific to be repulsive, we pay good money to watch it again and again. This is not a new question; it's as old as Aristotle, who addressed disgust as an emotion. Why do we enjoy ugly things? Why do we enjoy tragedy?

I've explained in previous posts that people watch horror movies as a way of coping with actual fears or violence in the world in which we live. That is a sound theory when you examine various decades in which horror movies were produced. But now I want to take a different approach and attack the question from a more specific psychological angle, independent of time and era.

Acknowledging Reality

This theory combines several points I discovered in my research for this topic, all of which acknowledge the relationship of what we're watching on screen to what we consider to be reality.

The first point is made by director Tom McLaughlin (One Dark Night) in the excellent documentary, Nightmares in Red White and Blue.  He claims we are drawn to the gothic elements of many horror movies.  The gothic period was a simpler, classier time, but there was another, darker side you wanted to explore.  Clinical psychologist Glenn Walters wrote about how horror movies generally stick to an almost Victorian moral code: the girl who has sex will probably be killed, as will the teenager who picks up a hitchhiker.
 
 
Walters further says that horror movies appeal to people who like predictability and acknowledge the ethical relativism between them and reality.  There is usually no question about who the bad guy is and, despite the body counts, horror movies tend to have (relatively) happy endings.  So, horror movies (the outcomes, at least) are certain; there are no doubts.  Reality is random; you can't control it.

In his book, "Why We Watch: The Attractions of Violent Entertainment", psychologist Jeffrey Goldstein leads us into the second point while he elaborates on this certainty in horror movies.  He says that horror movies must provide a just resolution in the end: the bad guy gets it.  In Nightmares in Red White and Blue, George A. Romero says that with horror, we get to upset the apple cart in ways we cannot do in real life; but, at the end, we get to set it back up again.  The consequences in a horror movie do not extend to reality.
 
There's also the point that we watch horror movies because we want to be distracted from our mundane reality.  Herein lies a paradox: we know horror films aren't real, we watch them because they aren't real, yet we want them to look like they're real.  How often do you hear as a criticism of a horror movie that the special effects are fake?  It seems we want scary movies to come as close to reality as possible without crossing the line into actual reality.  No matter what happens on screen we want to (and know we will) walk out safe.
 

Finally, our very perception of horror may depend on where it is rooted in our reality.  John Carpenter says (again in Nightmares in Red White and Blue) that there are two kinds of horror movies: external and internal.  Both are based on the location of the horror.  One is external with creatures who aren't like us.  The other is internal with the evil right here in our human hearts.  This may differ from person to person.  What scares you most: the unknown or the known?  The answer probably depends on your perspective of reality.

Well, I've cobbled together somewhat of a theory here.  This makes five that I've presented during my Countdown to Halloween.  But I still haven't answered the question of why I, Jeff Owens, love horror movies.  In one final post regarding the topic, sometime between now and next Wednesday, I'll finally try to get to the bottom of that.  I hope you'll join me…
 
Source:

Why Our Brains Love Horror Movies

No comments:

Post a Comment